- Webcast Royalty Rate Announced
- Pullquote:
That math suggests that the royalty rate decision — for the performance alone, not even including composers' royalties! — is in the in the ballpark of 100% or more of total revenues.
- Radio Paradise notes:
For some time, we've suffered with a system where we pay a large chunk (10%-12%) of our income to the Big 4 record companies - while FM stations and radio conglomerates like Clear Channel pay nothing. Now they want even more. In our case, an amount equal to 125% of our income. Our only hope is to create as much public awareness and outrage about this staggeringly unfair situation as possible. Neither the record industry nor Congress are ready to listen to us at this point. But members of the public (and the media) may well be, and we need to get their attention.
The rates are clearly intended to put music webcasts out of business. This is apparently the RIAA once again deciding that that they want to keep folks like me from buying their products.
You see, last year I bought a whopping 6 music CDs. I realize that doesn't make me a huge music consumer, but it's significant to note that that's 6 more CDs than I've purchased since sometime around 1993. I stopped buying music because most of my music exposure comes from friends and radio. Post-college, I just didn't hang out with as many music evangelists, and radio is so homogenized there's never anything of interest (and anything I do like is guaranteed to be overplayed until I'm sick of it anyway, so why spend the money?)
A little while back, though, I started listening to web radio (live 365, last.fm, pandora) and found there was actually stuff out there I like. So when I bought a car with a CD player in it, I picked up a few CDs (and found my dusty decade-and-a-half collection under some boxes).
So if the RIAA manages to shut down all music venues but Clearchannel, then all that's going to happen is I'll stop buying music again. That's not a vindictive boycott, and I don't mean I'll be going to "piracy" -- I'll just no longer find the music I like, and thus won't seek it out and buy it.
Because for some off reason they don't want me to buy any of their products. Isn't that weird behavior for a bunch of capitalists? The more they tighten their grip, the more customers will slip thru their fingers.
Incidentally.
2007-03-05 05:26 pm (UTC)
Re: Incidentally.
2007-03-05 05:46 pm (UTC)
I can't seem to find how it all shook out, though.
Re: Incidentally.
2007-03-05 06:34 pm (UTC)
2007-03-05 09:09 pm (UTC)
2007-03-05 09:34 pm (UTC)
2007-03-05 10:19 pm (UTC)
2007-03-05 11:34 pm (UTC)
2007-03-06 12:41 am (UTC)
2007-03-08 09:53 pm (UTC)
2007-03-12 12:13 am (UTC)
RIAA can't stop individual artists from making their music available in ways other than through RIAA. I'm sure they'd like to, but they really can't do it. RIAA bears a lot of resemblence to the mob in my opinion and it is really too bad that RICO can't be used against them. I think it would be appropriate.
I'm very much against stealing copyrighted materials, but RIAA's methods are not the right ones to stop piracy. Part of the way to stop piracy is to make stuff available legally at reasonable prices in the forms that people want. Also, preventing people from being exposed to works will not cause them to go out and legally buy them, will it? RIAA can't fool me into believing that they're doing what they're doing for the sake of the musicians.
2007-03-12 12:29 am (UTC)
The funny thing here is that, for me, this has nothing whatsoever to do with 'piracy'. I don't download music, and if this shuts down internet radio, I won't be driven to download music. I'll just stop buying music again and deal with the fact that homegenous public broadcasts are boring.
What burns me, though, is that they'll go ahead and blame the loss of money from customers like me on 'piracy', completely missing that it's their war on 'piracy' that's costing them sales, not the 'evil pirate conspiracy'.
2007-03-12 12:34 am (UTC)
Exactly. They're so busy screwing everybody in their attempts to stop piracy that they can't see the real reasons people aren't buying music in the ways they want them to. They're just big bullies who like to use their muscles. Stopping people from hearing music is NOT the way to get them to buy it.
2007-03-12 06:28 am (UTC)
2007-03-05 10:41 pm (UTC)
I hate to say this.....
2007-03-07 11:20 am (UTC)
I think they are going for the teenagers.... especially the teenagers that are very open to suggestion and leadable....that can be trained to be "good consumers".... and who have money from their parents and haven't learned that someone has to work to make it.....
As long as there are enough of those teenagers, they aren't going to care about us.
PS: I have a friend who is 40 and a damn good torch singer..... in order for her to get a booking at a club, she has to pay the club to host her....so if tons of people show up, the club gets their large fee, gets their drink and food money, and she gets a little piece of the ticket prices....if no one shows up, then the club still gets their large fee, and she is worse off than before.....
and that doesn't even cover that she has made some CDs before that she can't get played on any radio station because only certain artists that have signed their lives away to these big 4 stations can, by deliberate contract, get any airtime.....
Even Gasoline Alley is closed down now....
Suzi
Re: I hate to say this.....
2007-03-07 02:51 pm (UTC)
Incidentally, if your friend wants webradio airplay, I have a friend who runs a couple of independent-only webradio stations: http://www.blowupradio.com/
Blowupradio is for NJ artists and Laslo's Den is for general independent music.
Re: I hate to say this.....
2007-03-08 08:59 pm (UTC)
What I think people don't understand is that those kids are now adults... with money. I spent over $350 alone on tickets to Depeche Mode’s last tour, and that doesn’t count cd’s, shirts, etc. Their latest is their best album since Songs Of Faith And Devotion, yet got close to zero airplay (other than on alternative music sources, i.e. Pandora, and Sirius Alt Nation – which I get free through Dish Network on my tv).
I am both the ideal music customer and one that the companies hate, since I listen to what I enjoy rather than what is shoved down my throat. If they happen to be the same, then good for me and good for them, but if not, oh well. I’m still going to seek out what I like and purchase only that, even if it’s not what they decide to market that week. Pandora is one of my purchasing staples these days – I’m even considering getting their pay service since I got the hubby a Squeezebox for Christmas – and I’ve bought more music because of them than almost any other influence. I also have a subscription to Emusic which is one of the best downloadable services online, particularly if you listen to a lot of small label bands.
So why shit on the person who spent $350 on tickets to one tour? The one who has a running music subscription service? The one who went to 21 concerts in 2006 and bought 20 cd’s at the beginning of this year alone?
The RIAA is a bunch of fucking criminals who need to get it through their thick skulls that things change, and repeatedly shitting on their consumers will not win them any fans, nor will it protect the illegal monopoly that they are so desperately trying to save.
Oh... and the whole new goth = emo thing is annoying. That's a whole other topic on which I could rant upon, but I won't.
Re: I hate to say this.....
2007-03-08 09:01 pm (UTC)
1. My grammar sucks dick.
2. Yes, that is a Depeche Mode icon. Here's my Duran Duran one.
3. You'd think that long term band loyalty would be a bigger cash cow than a potential flavor of the week failure.